Reasoning in Maliki jurisprudence. Attainment by al-Mahdawi as an example

Document Type : Original Article

Author

.

Abstract

Anyone who studies the concept of Islamic jurisprudence will find that the basic pillar on which its rulings are built is the Sharia evidence, which confirms that linking the branches of jurisprudence to their origins and Sharia evidence is a Sharia requirement and a desired goal in Islamic Sharia.

The Maliki school of thought is one of the most famous and respected Islamic schools of thought in Islamic jurisprudence, but many scholars have spread accusations about it of stripping its jurisprudence of evidence.The aim of this is to renew the call for the necessity of reviving the method of proof in the Maliki school of thought, whether in dealing with abstract abbreviations, in search of proof for them, or even with the works that mentioned proof, by correcting reasoning and not limiting it to textual textual evidence only, but rather using reasoning. mental; Because it is one of the aspects of pampering the branches.

The book (At-Tahseel li Fawa’id Kitab al-Tasheel al-Jami’ al-Ahkam al-Tanzil) by al-Mahdawi is considered one of the books of interpretation. As it contains multiple sciences, including rulings, transcription, interpretation, readings, parsing, and others, and thus it is a great work and widespread goodness.

Through this interpretation, I addressed the issue of evidence for rulings, which Al-Mahdawi summarized in his interpretation, because of its importance in Islamic jurisprudence in general, and Maliki jurisprudence in particular

Keywords

Main Subjects

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics